Are we rapidly morphing into the People’s Republic of Amerika? It appears to be the new policy from Washington that if it moves tax it, regulate it or subsidize it. Our Constitution is rapidly becoming a mere outdated list of suggestions, as greed in ‘the private sector’ sells out to increased government control with greater willingness each day. The new president, with more than a few Socialist strings to his bow, joins Senate and House Liberals wielding the power to orchestrate the destruction of anything resembling business as we know it.
The first incursion was a bailout package. Wouldn’t you like a bailout when you make a bad decision? In fact the more bad decisions you make, the more money you get! You see, that way all the risk is removed and business simply becomes a ‘do-over’, like when you were a kid playing Monopoly and one of your dice rolled off the table. It’s a terrific theory — except it has never worked and it lets a mob of know-nothing politicians enter your company right through the front door.
Since the initial bailout attempt, predictably, was a disaster it had to be renamed; it’s now a stimulus package! The only problem is, there’s nothing in it to stimulate anything except the government’s grip on ‘free markets’ — nothing that offers remedy for our immediate economic downturn.
Proponents in the Senate will most likely strip out a few items as bargaining chips but unless they kill the whole
thing, it’s simply a bad bill and a major step toward converting America into just another failed, Socialist nation. By any other name, it’s still $1.17 Trillion in pork and paybacks. Let’s see what’s really in there that responsible legislators find objectionable:
- $1 billion for Amtrak, which hasn’t earned a profit in four decades.
- $2 billion to help subsidize child care.
- $400 million for research into global warming.
- $2.4 billion for projects to demonstrate how carbon greenhouse gas can be safely removed from the atmosphere.
- $650 million for coupons to help consumers convert their TV sets from analog to digital, part of the digital TV conversion.
- $600 million to buy a new fleet of cars for federal employees and government departments.
- $75 million to fund programs to help people quit smoking.
- $21 million to re-sod the National Mall, which suffered heavy use during the Inauguration.
- $2.25 billion for national parks. This item has sparked calls for an investigation, because the chief lobbyist of the National Parks Association is the son of Rep. David R. Obey, D-Wisc.
- $335 million for treatment and prevention of sexually transmitted diseases.
- $50 million for the National Endowment for the Arts. $4.19 billion to stave off foreclosures via the Neighborhood Stabilization Program, which means a substantial amount of it will be captured by ACORN, the controversial activist group currently under federal investigation for vote fraud. Another $750 million would be exclusively reserved for nonprofits such as ACORN – meaning cities and states are barred from receiving that money. Sen. David Vitter, R-La., charges the money appears to be a “payoff” for the partisan political activities of these community groups during the last election cycle.
- $44 million to renovate the headquarters building of the Agriculture Department.
- $32 billion for a “smart electricity grid to minimize waste.
- $87 billion of Medicaid funds, to aid states.
- $53.4 billion for science facilities, high speed Internet, and miscellaneous energy and environmental programs.
- $13 billion to repair and weatherize public housing.
- $20 billion for quicker depreciation and write-offs for equipment.
- $10.3 billion for tax credits to help families defray the cost of college tuition.
- $20 billion over five years for an expanded food stamp program.
Would someone please explain to me how funding for anti-smoking, T.V. converters, a political action group like Acorn or $44,000,000 for sod is going to get the economy back on track? This is not to say there aren’t some worthwhile projects being addressed but an alleged stimulus bill is not the place to address them.
As House Minority whip Eric Cantor, R-Va., told the media last week and John McCain re-emphasized last night, “This is not a stimulus bill. It is a spending bill.” It is a very expensive mistake that is bad for both generations of taxpayers and the future of American business.









Dutch Boy Mentality
Have we become afraid of winning?
I first noticed the phenomenon while in radio during the early nineties and dismissed it as a characteristic of that particular industry. Then I began comparing notes with friends working in other industries and realized it was, in fact, widespread and getting worse. What I’m referring to is the obsession we have developed with over-protecting existing business rather than being innovative or pursuing more new opportunities. Have we lost our competitive spirit?
It’s a defensive mentality that seems to invade every area of our lives, from the manner in which we market goods and services to the way we conduct our wars. Most companies carefully craft advertising not to offend an audience, at the expense of originality or delivering an actual sales message. Ah, focus groups … of course: ask some loaded questions, call the answers feedback and then address the lowest common denominator. Unfortunately, that tends to leave those with more brain cells than an amoeba sort of twisting in the wind but it does provide a margin of false security for the company.
Stores stock large quantities of goods but without much variety. You can find dozens of colors from ‘peach raspberry’ to ‘Piccadilly purple’ but, if you’re a woman, just try to buy something besides ‘hip-huggers’ whether you want to show off your butterfly tattoo or not! One car looks pretty much the same as another and now every auto maker has to make a lawnmower with seats to keep up with the ‘green’ hoax we’re all being force-fed. If the other guy is doing well, make one like him so you don’t lose any ground (Anyone heard of making one better and gaining ground?). By the way, what was the last military action you remember where the talk was of victory instead of avoiding collateral damage and exit strategies? That’s why even world wars used to last a comparatively few years … everyone knew the exit strategy going in: it was called winning!
I learned to win in business, not to keep looking over my shoulder. Sure your best growth comes from existing customers but there are a few other natural laws that also need to be accepted. They include the fact that you’ll always lose a certain amount of your base through attrition, so you’ve got to get more. You’ve got to get more business to replace natural attrition and you’ve got to get more business in order to grow. By definition growth never occurs through retrenchment, however stagnation does quite nicely.
It sounds pretty simple, right? So where did winning go? “Less is more” is one of the most stupid statements I’ve ever heard. Some people actually build marketing strategies based upon that precious pearl. I’m sorry but MORE is more; it always has been and always will be. In case you don’t believe me, I’ll tell you what. You give me twenty dollars and I’ll give you two fives. Do you have more? If you say “Yes,” then come right over to my house … and bring your wallet.
As long as we keep our fingers in the dike waiting for help, work will continue to be outsourced to more competitive economies, jobs will be lost and foreign investors, focused on winning, will own more of our big companies than ever before. WE are the help we’ve been waiting for! It’s time to stop shuffling in circles, simply because the other guy isn’t picking up his feet, and start sprinting for more by recapturing innovation, fostering creativity and exercising the foresight that have always been the hallmarks of American business.